Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. Senior Operations LLC
| Los Angeles Waterkeeper |
| Senior Operations LLC and Senior Operations LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Company doing business as Senior Aerospace SSP |
| 2:2021cv08980 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Otis D Wright |
| Environmental Matters |
| 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Commencement of 45 day review period filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - DOJ email re 45 day commencement)(Barnes, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 12
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Senior Operations LLC identifying Senior PLC as Corporate Parent. (Mills, Michael)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Settlement Tentative Settlement filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Consent Decree as Exhibit)(Barnes, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 10
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #4 as to defendant Senior Operations LLC. (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #7 filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Barnes, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh)
|
|
Filing 4
COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 11/16/2021, receipt number 32332611), filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Intent Letter as Exhibit)(Barnes, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper, (Attorney Anthony Michael Barnes added to party Los Angeles Waterkeeper(pty:pla))(Barnes, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #1 filed by plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Barnes, Anthony)
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Los Angeles Waterkeeper. (Barnes, Anthony)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
