Integon National Insurance Company v. Wayne Wu et al
| Integon National Insurance Company |
| Wayne Wu and Ceila Wu Contreras |
| 2:2021cv08981 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Integon National Insurance Company. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Howe, Patrick) |
Filing 15
IN CHAMBERS ORDER-TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: The Order to Show Cause #12 , issued on 12/16/2021, is DISCHARGED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Integon National Insurance Company.(Howe, Patrick) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Integon National Insurance Companyto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #12 (Howe, Patrick) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Show Cause Response due by 12/23/2021.) (See minute order for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Integon National Insurance Company, upon Defendant Ceila Wu Contreras served on 11/24/2021, answer due 12/15/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe, resident of household in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Howe, Patrick) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Integon National Insurance Company, upon Defendant Wayne Wu served on 11/24/2021, answer due 12/15/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe, resident of household in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Howe, Patrick) |
|
Filing 9
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Ceila Wu Contreras and Wayne Wu. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Integon National Insurance Company, identifying National General Management Corp. and National General Holdings Corp.. (Howe, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Integon National Insurance Company. (Howe, Patrick) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Integon National Insurance Company. (Howe, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32333143 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Integon National Insurance Company. (Attorney Patrick M Howe added to party Integon National Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Howe, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
