Sandeep Roy Chauhan v. Google Inc.
| Sandeep Roy Chauhan |
| Google Inc. |
| 2:2021cv09054 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Judge George H. Wu, ORDERING Notice of Dismissal submitted by Plaintiff Sandeep Roy Chauhan received on 12/23/21 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Case dosed on November 23, 2021. Transferred to USDC Northern District of California. (lom)
|
| Filing 9 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from California Northern District, 5:21-cv-09201 filed 11/29/2021. (iv) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: INTER-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action - and the Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF 2) as to which this Court has taken no action - is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (see document for further details). Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (hr)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-09054 GW(JCx). (rn)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sandeep Roy Chauhan. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Google Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Google Inc. Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi, filed by plaintiff Sandeep Roy Chauhan. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/18/2021: #2 Summons) (ghap). Modified on 11/18/2021 (ghap). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sandeep Roy Chauhan v. Google Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sandeep Roy Chauhan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Google Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
