Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2021cv09074 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV21-9074 PVC on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Susan L Smith added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Smith, Susan) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh. (Shapiro, Brian) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 12/6/2021, answer due 3/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel,. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Shapiro, Brian) |
Filing 9
ORDER ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (hr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh, (Shapiro, Brian) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh. (Shapiro, Brian) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh. (Shapiro, Brian) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh. (Shapiro, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh. (Attorney Brian C Shapiro added to party Abduljabbar Sulieman Alharahsheh(pty:pla))(Shapiro, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
