Matthew E. Orso v. Todd Disner et al
| Matthew E. Orso in his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com |
| Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC, Jerry Napier, Darren Miller, Rhonda Gates, David Sorrells, Innovation Marketing, LLC, Aaron Andrews, Shara Andrews, Global Internet Formula, Inc., T. Lemont Silver, Karen Silver, Michael Van Leeuwen, Durant Brockett, David Kettner, Mary Kettner, P.A.W.S. Capital Management LLC, Lori Jean Weber, Class of New Winners in Zeekrewards.com and C Scott Blevins |
| Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc |
| 2:2021cv09078 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: First REQUEST for Order for Order for Service of process by registered process order #5 , for the following reasons: case number is missing. (yl)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: First REQUEST for Order for Order for Service of process by registered process order #5 . Document # 5 Due to clerical error. The 2:21-9078 PSG was opened in error. Document # 5 e-filed on wrong case number should be filed on 2:21-cv-03613 PSG. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because subsequent filings have changed the nature of the case. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez is assigned to this new case number 2:21-cv-9078 PSG. All future documents must be filed under this new case number. The previous case number, 2:21-mc-184 UA, is hereby terminated. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 First REQUEST for Order for Order for Service of process by registered process order filed by nationwide Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Carruthers, Dennis) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because subsequent filings have changed the nature of the case. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez is assigned to this new case number 2:21-cv-3613 PSG. All future documents must be filed under this new case number. The previous case number, 2:21-mc-00184 UA, is hereby terminated. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 First REQUEST for Order for ORDER FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS BY REGISTERED PROCESS SERVER filed by MOVANT Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Carruthers, Dennis) |
| Filing 2 ABSTRACT of Judgment issued in favor of Movant Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc and against C Scott Blevins in the principal amount of $ 28,363.11, interest in the amount of $ 2,372.90, attorneys fees of $ 0.00, costs of $ 0.00. RE: MISC - Registration of Judgment from Another District (AO-451) #1 . (lom) |
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION OF JUDGMENT FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT Receipt No: ACACDC-30694848 - Fee: $49, filed by movant Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc. (Attorney Dennis Scott Carruthers added to party Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc(pty:mov))(Carruthers, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
