Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry et al v. Ironman Productions, Inc.
| BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan and Board of Directors of the Motion Picture industry Individual Account Plan |
| IRONMAN PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Minnesota corporation, and Ironman Productions, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv09142 |
| November 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Ironman Productions, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, (Halford, Kathryn) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN. (Halford, Kathryn) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN. (Halford, Kathryn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32368468 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Attorney Kathryn Jane Halford added to party BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN(pty:pla))(Halford, Kathryn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry et al v. Ironman Productions, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Jane Halford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan | |
| Represented By: | Harrison A Levy |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Jane Halford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Board of Directors of the Motion Picture industry Individual Account Plan | |
| Represented By: | Harrison A Levy |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Jane Halford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: IRONMAN PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Minnesota corporation, | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ironman Productions, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
