Danielle K. Holland v. Ford Motor Company
DANIELLE K. HOLLAND |
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2021cv09161 |
November 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
R Gary Klausner |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Receipt of Acknowledgment of documents by Los Angeles Superior Court, case no. 21STCV38622]. (lom) |
Filing 14 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (lom) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Order Remanding Action to State Court by Judge R. Gary Klausner. In light of the foregoing, the action is hereby remanded to state court for all further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the Pleadings filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Motion set for hearing on 2/28/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of C. Taggart, #3 Exhibit 1 to Decl. of C. Taggart, #4 Exhibit 2 to Decl. of C. Taggart, #5 Exhibit 3 to Decl. of C. Taggart, #6 Exhibit 4 to Decl. of C. Taggart, #7 Proposed Order) (Taggart, Craig) |
Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5, filed by Plaintiff Danielle K. Holland.. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Mortenson, Michael) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/31/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 2/7/2022 at 9:00 am. (sw) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 7 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to the calendar of Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:21-cv-09161 RGK(PVCx). (rn) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, attached as Exhibit 2.(jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Danielle K. Holland in Los Angeles Superior Court on 10/20/2021, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY, (Mortenson, Michael) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Mortenson, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV38622 Receipt No: ACACDC-32371295 - Fee: $402, filed by DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of M. Mortenson, #2 Exhibit 1 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #3 Exhibit 2 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #4 Exhibit 3 to Decl. of M. Mortenson, #5 Exhibit 4 to Decl. of M. Mortenson) (Attorney Michael Donn Mortenson added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY (pty:dft))(Mortenson, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.