Hee Soon Park v. G and W Ventures Inc. et al
| Hee Soon Park |
| G and W Ventures Inc. and Does 1 through 10 |
| 2:2021cv09178 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: In response to the Court's order to show cause why it should not decline supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs claim under the Unruh Act #10 , Plaintiff filed a notice that she is electing not to pursue her Unruh Act claim and requesting dismissal of that claim without prejudice #11 . Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs claim under the Unruh Act is DISMISSED without prejudice. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Hee Soon Parkto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: This case is still at a very early stage, and this Court has not yet addressed or adjudicated the merits of any of Plaintiff's claims. This appears to be a case in which the Court should decline supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim under Section 1367(c)(4) to protect the comity interests identified in Arroyo v. Rosas, No. 19-55974, 2021 WL 5858598 (9th Cir. Dec. 10, 2021). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff within 14 days after entry of this Order to show cause in writing why the Court should not dismiss without prejudice her Unruh Act claim under Section 1367(c)(4). If Plaintiff fails to file a response within 14 days after entry of this Order, the Court will decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her Unruh Act claim, and the Unruh Act claim will be automatically dismissed without prejudice without further order of the Court. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant G and W Ventures Inc. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Hee Soon Park. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hee Soon Park, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hee Soon Park. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-32374213 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Hee Soon Park. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Hee Soon Park(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
