Carmen Enciso v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company et al
| Carmen Enciso |
| Jackson National Life Insurance Company and Does 1-100 |
| 2:2021cv09205 |
| November 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF Carmen Enciso, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #21 , Amended Complaint/Petition #19 , Declaration #20 served on 1/22/2022. (Kar, Joseph) |
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carmen Enciso, (Kar, Joseph) |
| Filing 20 DECLARATION of Carmen Enciso re Amended Complaint/Petition #19 re: C.C.P. sec. 377.32 filed by Plaintiff Carmen Enciso. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Death Certificate)(Kar, Joseph) |
| Filing 19 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by plaintiff Carmen Enciso(Kar, Joseph) |
Filing 18
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #17 , the Court hereby ORDERS that the time within which Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company may answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended 30 days until and including 2/14/2022. (gk)
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to February 14, 2022 re Order,, Order Extending Answer Due Deadline, #12 , Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation)(Belcher, David) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee Granting Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney David A. Belcher for Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company in place of Attorneys Craig R. Bockman and Fredrick A. Rafeedie #15 . (gk)
|
| Filing 15 REQUEST TO WITHDRAW ATTORNEY Craig R. Bockman as counsel of record filed by Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Bockman, Craig) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Request for Substitution of Attorney. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Craig R Bockman counsel for Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company. Craig R. Bockman and Fredrick A. Rafeedie is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bockman, Craig) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #11 , the Court hereby ORDERS that the time within which Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company may answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended 14 days until and including 1/14/2022. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 14, 2022 re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation)(Belcher, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David Belcher on behalf of Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company (Attorney David Belcher added to party Jackson National Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Belcher, David) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jackson National Life Insurance Company answer now due 12/31/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company.(Bockman, Craig) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company, served on 12-1-21. (Bockman, Craig) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, Jackson National Life Insurance Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Carmen Enciso. Filed in State Court on 3/17/2021 Submitted with Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE filed by Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company. of Interested Parties (Bockman, Craig) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Bockman, Craig) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Luis Obispo, case number 21CV-0154 Receipt No: ACACDC-32381877 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Jackson National Life Insurance Company. (Attorney Craig R Bockman added to party Jackson National Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Bockman, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
