Samantha M. Perales v. Mastercorp, Inc
Plaintiff: Samantha M Perales
Defendant: Mastercorp, Inc and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv09232
Filed: November 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Dale S Fischer
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice as to Plaintiffs individual claims against Defendant Mastercorp, Inc., and without prejudice as to the putative class as to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party bearing that party's own attorney's fees and costs #11 . The Clerk is directed to close the file. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
January 3, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by PLAINTIFF Samantha M Perales. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Cohen, Darren)
December 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge John F. Walter, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:20-cv-06284 JFW(ASx) (rn)
November 30, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by defendant Mastercorp, Inc. Motion set for hearing on 1/24/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum DEFENDANT MASTERCORP, INC.S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY THIS ACTION, #2 Declaration DECLARATION OF CANDACE NEELY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY THIS ACTION, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A to Neely Declaration - Agreement to Mediate and Arbitrate, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B to Neely Declaration - Employee Authorizations, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C - Employee Termination Information, #6 Proposed Order Proposed Order GRANTING Motion to Compel Arbitration or Dismiss) (DeClercq, William)
November 30, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by plaintiff Mastercorp, Inc. Related Case(s): SD Cal 3:19-cv-02424-CAB-WVG; San Diego Superior Court 37-2020-00015649-CU-OE-CTL; CD Cal 2:20-cv-06284-JFW-AS; Los Angeles Superior Court 20STCV05457 (DeClercq, William)
November 30, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Mastercorp, Inc, identifying plaintiff Samantha M. Perales and defendant MasterCorp, Inc., only. (DeClercq, William)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
November 30, 2021 Filing 5 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
November 30, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
November 30, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil)
November 24, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Samantha M Perales in Los Angeles Superior Court on 10/21/2021, attached as Exhibit B. (jtil)
November 24, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mastercorp, Inc. (DeClercq, William)
November 24, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California, County of Los Angeles, case number 21STCV38842 Receipt No: ACACDC-32385928 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Mastercorp, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robin Reininger, #2 Declaration of William DeClercq, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Complaint, #5 Exhibit California Civil Case Cover Sheet with Los Angeles Superior Court Addendum, #6 Exhibit Notice of Assignment, #7 Exhibit Los Angeles Superior Court - Local Forms and ADR Information Sheet, #8 Exhibit General Order re Use of Voluntary Early Litigation Stipulations) (Attorney William Benjamin DeClercq added to party Mastercorp, Inc(pty:dft))(DeClercq, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Samantha M. Perales v. Mastercorp, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha M Perales
Represented By: Darren M Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mastercorp, Inc
Represented By: William Benjamin DeClercq
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 to 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?