Laltitude LLC v. DreamBuilder Toy LLC et al
Laltitude LLC |
DreamBuilder Toy LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive |
2:2021cv09324 |
December 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John W Holcomb |
Ronald SW Lew |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Laltitude LLC, upon Defendant DreamBuilder Toy LLC served on 1/15/2022, answer due 2/7/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe - Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Petersen, Lara) |
Filing 15 STANDING ORDER by Judge John W. Holcomb. (iva) |
Filing 14 This action has been reassigned to the Honorable John W. Holcomb, United States District Judge. Judge Holcomb is located in Courtroom 2, on the 2nd Floor of the George E. Brown, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse at 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, California 92501. Additional information regarding Judge Holcomb's procedures and schedules is available on the Court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (iva) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 13 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge John W. Holcomb for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-09324 JWH(JPRx). (rn) |
Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant DreamBuilder Toy LLC. (et) |
Filing 11 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
Filing 8 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff Laltitude LLC. Amended Exhibits A-B as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (Petersen, Lara) |
Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lara Alexandra Petersen counsel for Plaintiff Laltitude LLC. Adding Ariana Santoro as counsel of record for Laltitude LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Laltitude LLC. (Petersen, Lara) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lara Alexandra Petersen counsel for Plaintiff Laltitude LLC. Adding Omid E. Khalifeh as counsel of record for Laltitude LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Laltitude LLC. (Petersen, Lara) |
Filing 5 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Laltitude LLC, (Petersen, Lara) |
Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Laltitude LLC. (Petersen, Lara) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Laltitude LLC. (Petersen, Lara) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Laltitude LLC. (Petersen, Lara) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32408950 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Laltitude LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-B) (Attorney Lara Alexandra Petersen added to party Laltitude LLC(pty:pla))(Petersen, Lara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.