David Sheffield v. Fay Servicing, LLC et al
Plaintiff: David Sheffield
Defendant: Fay Servicing, LLC, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv09412
Filed: December 3, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2021 Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: ORDER DISMISSING ACTION #10 . On December 6, 2021, Plaintiff David Sheffield filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Entire Action without Prejudice. Having reviewed the Notice of Dismissal and finding good cause therefor, the court DISMISSES theaction without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Plaintiffs request to withdraw his ex parte application #7 , is DENIED as MOOT. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
December 6, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff David Sheffield. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Shapero, Sarah)
December 6, 2021 Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #3 . After reviewing Plaintiffs ex parte application, the court DENIES the TRO without prejudice for Plaintiffs failure to demonstrate the courts subject matter jurisdiction or likelihood of success on the merits. For the aforementioned reasons, the court DENIES the ex parte application without prejudice. The court further DISMISSES the Complaint with 14 days leave to amend, to allow Plaintiff to plead facts regarding the grounds for the courts subject matter jurisdiction. (lc) Modified on 12/6/2021 (lc).
December 6, 2021 Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Aaron Robert Goldstein counsel for Defendants Fay Servicing, LLC, U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.. Adding Aaron R. Goldstein as counsel of record for Fay Servicing, LLC and U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Fay Servicing, LLC and U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust. (Attorney Aaron Robert Goldstein added to party Fay Servicing, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Aaron Robert Goldstein added to party U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. (pty:dft))(Goldstein, Aaron)
December 6, 2021 Filing 7 REQUEST to Withdraw EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to to Enjoin the Foreclosure Sale of Plaintiff's Property Scheduled for December 7, 2021 at 10:00 am #3 filed by plaintiff David Sheffield. (Shapero, Sarah)
December 3, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
December 3, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
December 3, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil)
December 3, 2021 Filing 3 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to to Enjoin the Foreclosure Sale of Plaintiff's Property Scheduled for December 7, 2021 at 10:00 am filed by plaintiff DAVID SHEFFIELD. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, #2 Declaration OF DAVID SHEFFIELD IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO RESTRAIN THE FORECLOSURE SALE OF PLAINTIFFS PROPERTY, #3 Declaration OF SARAH SHAPERO IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO RESTRAIN FORECLOSURE SALE OF PLAINTIFFS PROPERTY, #4 Proposed Order) (Shapero, Sarah)
December 3, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff DAVID SHEFFIELD. (Shapero, Sarah)
December 3, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32425586 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff DAVID SHEFFIELD. (Attorney Sarah Elizabeth Shapero added to party DAVID SHEFFIELD(pty:pla))(Shapero, Sarah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Sheffield v. Fay Servicing, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Sheffield
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Shapero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fay Servicing, LLC
Represented By: Aaron Robert Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Bank Trust, N.A.
Represented By: Aaron Robert Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?