Justin Falahi v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Justin Falahi |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase & Co., JPMorgan Chase and Co. and Does 1 through 5, inclusive |
2:2021cv09449 |
December 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael R Wilner |
Otis D Wright |
Banks and Banking |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Emily J Kirk to Pro Hac Vice Application Due (G-109) - optional html form, #7 . (sbou) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Justin Falahi. upon JPMorgan Chase and Co. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 12/13/2021, answer due 2/11/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Julia B. Strickland, Attorney for Defendant. (Wright, David) |
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Justin Falahi. upon JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 12/13/2021, answer due 2/11/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Julia B. Strickland, Attorney for Defendant. (Wright, David) |
Filing 10 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Case transferred from Judge Stephen V. Wilson to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:21-cv-09449 ODW(MRWx). (rn) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase and Co. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Kirk. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Justin Falahi, (Wright, David) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Justin Falahi. (Wright, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32433983 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Justin Falahi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney David C Wright added to party Justin Falahi(pty:pla))(Wright, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.