John Ho v. Lakeview Plaza, LLC
Plaintiff: John Ho
Defendant: LAKEVIEW PLAZA, LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv09465
Filed: December 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2022 Filing 17 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Lakeview Plaza, LLC answer now due 3/4/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Lakeview Plaza, LLC.(Attorney Sean A Topp added to party Lakeview Plaza, LLC(pty:dft))(Topp, Sean)
January 21, 2022 Filing 16 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Clerk RE: Plaintiff's Response to the Court's Order to Show CauseRe Supplemental Jurisdiction filed 1/18/2022 #13 . The document is stricken. (gk)
January 21, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff John Ho. correcting Response, #13 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Tsao, Pamela)
January 20, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Response, #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Document submitted in the wrong case. This filing should have been docketed under the case John Ho v. May Ku, etc., Case No. CV 21-08496 DMG (JEMx). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
January 18, 2022 Filing 13 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS ON 1/18/2022, SEE DOCKET NO. 16] RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff John Hoto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Order to Show Cause,,, #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of John Ho, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of John Ho, #3 Declaration Declaration of Pamela Tsao, #4 Exhibit A to Declaration of Pamela Tsao)(Tsao, Pamela) Modified on 1/21/2022 (gk).
January 17, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Ho, upon Defendant Lakeview Plaza, LLC served on 1/12/2022, answer due 2/2/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cory Gunastead - Employee/Person In Charge in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Tsao, Pamela)
January 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. In responding to this Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff shall identify the amount of statutory damages Plaintiff seeks to recover. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by 1/18/2022. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of any such claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c). Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
December 10, 2021 Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
December 8, 2021 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Lakeview Plaza, LLC. (car)
December 8, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
December 8, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
December 8, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car)
December 7, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Ho, (Tsao, Pamela)
December 7, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Tsao, Pamela)
December 7, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Tsao, Pamela)
December 7, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32437872 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff John Ho. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Photos) (Attorney Pamela Tsao added to party John Ho(pty:pla))(Tsao, Pamela)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Ho v. Lakeview Plaza, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Ho
Represented By: Pamela Tsao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LAKEVIEW PLAZA, LLC
Represented By: Sean A Topp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?