Metro Global Group, LLC v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
| Metro Global Group, LLC |
| Raytheon Technologies Corporation, United Technologies Corporation and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv09516 |
| December 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO SET ALTERNATIVE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File, #10 : IT IS ORDERED that the stipulation of the parties is DENIED as moot as the action has been remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court. (bm)
|
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (mrgo) |
| Filing 11 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE via ZOOM held before Judge Percy Anderson. At the status conference, Defendant's counsel was asked if he had any evidence concerning Plaintiff's citizenship and was given an opportunity to supplement the allegations in the Notice of Removal. Defendant proffered no additional sufficient facts or argument in support of the Court's exercise of subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Plaintiff's counsel moved for the Court to remand the action to Los Angeles Superior Court based on Defendant's failure to adequately allege a basis for the Court's subject matter jurisdiction in the Notice of Removal. Based on Defendant's failure to satisfy its burden to adequately allege a basis for the Court's subject matter jurisdiction, the Court grants plaintiff's Motion to Remand. Accordingly, this action is hereby remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case Number 21VECV01538, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). (See minute order for details). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Amy Diaz (video). (mrgo) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File a motion to dismiss, and set alternative briefing schedule for defendant's motion filed by Defendant Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kessel, Bart) |
|
Filing 9
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 1/24/2022 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (See order for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See attached document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, United Technologies Corporation, filed by Plaintiff Metro Global Group, LLC. Filed in State Court on 11/9/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Metro Global Group, LLC, upon Defendant Raytheon Technologies Corporation served on 11/15/2021, answer due 12/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Melvin Bautista CT Corp Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. Filed in State Court on 11/23/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 12/10/2021 (car). |
| CONFORMED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, United Technologies Corporation amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Metro Global Group, LLC. Filed in State Court on 11/29/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Metro Global Group, LLC, upon Defendant United Technologies Corporation served on 11/15/2021, answer due 12/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Melvin Bautista CT Corp Agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. Filed in State Court on 11/23/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Raytheon Technologies Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on December 8, 2021. (Kessel, Bart) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Raytheon Technologies Corporation, (Kessel, Bart) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Kessel, Bart) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21VECV01538 Receipt No: ACACDC-32448884 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Raytheon Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Bart L. Kessel with Exhibits 1 to 5) (Attorney Bart L. Kessel added to party Raytheon Technologies Corporation(pty:dft))(Kessel, Bart) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
