Tarren Clark v. Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center et al
| Tarren Clark |
| Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Dr. Carl Fleischer, Dr. Barry Guze, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Mercy Hospital St. Louis, Metropolitan St. Louis Psychatric Center, SSM Depaul Hospital St. Louis, Wake Forest University, Wake Forest University Police, Chief Regina Lawson, James Rae, Don Moore, Winston Salem Police Department, Washington University, Patrick Monahan, James Hartenbach and Joel Ruezhel |
| 2:2021cv09569 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge John A. Kronstadt that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson for the following reasons: (1) Legally and/or factually patently frivolous. (2) Immunity as to Prosecutor defendants. See attached memorandu. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST for U.S. Marshall's to Serve Defendants for Free and out of State, filed by Plaintiff Tarren Clark. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Tarren Clark. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tarren Clark, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Barnes-Jewish Hospital, Carl Fleischer, Barry Guze, James Hartenbach, Regina Lawson, Mercy Hospital St. Louis, Metropolitan St. Louis Psychatric Center, Patrick Monahan, Don Moore, James Rae, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Joel Ruezhel, SSM Depaul Hospital St. Louis, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Wake Forest University, Wake Forest University Police, Washington University, Winston Salem Police Department Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Filed by Plaintiff Tarren Clark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request as to Defendant Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, #3 Summons Request as to Defendant Dr. Carl Fleischer, #4 Summons Request as to Defendant Dr. Barry Guze, #5 Summons Request as to Defendant Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, #6 Summons Request as to Defendant Barnes Jewish Hospital, #7 Summons Request as to Defendant Mercy Medical Center, #8 Summons Request as to Defendant Metropolitan St. Louis Psychatric Center, #9 Summons Request as to Defendant SSM Depaul Hospital St. Louis, #10 Summons Request as to Defendant Wake Forest University, #11 Summond Request as to Defendant Wake Forest University Police, #12 Summons Request as to Chief Regina Lawson, #13 Summons Request as to Defendant James Rae, #14 Summons Request as to Defendant Don Moore, #15 Summons Request as to Defendant Winston Salem Police Department, #16 Summons Request as to Defendant Washington University, #17 Summons Request as to Defendant Patrick Monahan, #18 Summons Request as to Defendant James Hartenbach, #19 Summons Request as to Joel Ruezhel) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
