Kyung Moon v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Kyung Moon |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2021cv09572 |
| December 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Karen E Scott |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Armand D Roth added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Roth, Armand)
|
|
Filing 11
PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Kyung Moon, served on 12/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Herrera, Betty)
|
|
Filing 10
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. [See document for details.] (et)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL(JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Plaintiff will promptly serve the summons and complaint on the government in accordance with Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. [See document for further details.] (et)
|
|
Filing 8
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (et)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott granting #5 MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis: IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. (bm)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Kyung Moon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Herrera, Betty)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kyung Moon, identifying Betty Herrera. (Herrera, Betty)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kyung Moon. (Herrera, Betty)
|
|
Filing 2
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kyung Moon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Herrera, Betty)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Kyung Moon. (Attorney Betty Herrera added to party Kyung Moon(pty:pla))(Herrera, Betty)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kyung Moon v. Kilolo Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kyung Moon | |
| Represented By: | Betty Herrera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Armand D Roth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
