Jason Warner v. Health Net of California, Inc. et al
Jason Warner |
Health Net of California Inc., Health Net Life Insurance Company, Health Net of California, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
2:2021cv09596 |
December 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Michael R Wilner |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr re Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days), #12 . THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that: Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is extended until February 14, 2022. (mrgo) |
Filing 12 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 02/14/2022 re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #10 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Health Net Life Insurance Company, Health Net of California, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shaumyan, Alfred) |
Filing 11 Certificate of Filing and Service of Notice to Adverse Parties and To State Court of Removal of Action to Federal Court (Shaumyan, Alfred) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Health Net Life Insurance Company answer now due 1/14/2022; Health Net of California, Inc. answer now due 1/14/2022, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Health Net Life Insurance Company; Health Net of California, Inc..(Shaumyan, Alfred) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Health Net Life Insurance Company, Health Net of California, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Jason Warner. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/10/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Health Net Life Insurance Company, Health Net of California Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 12-10-2021. (Shaumyan, Alfred) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Health Net Life Insurance Company, Health Net of California Inc. identifying Centene Corporation; Health Net LLC as Corporate Parent. (Shaumyan, Alfred) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Health Net Life Insurance Company, Health Net of California Inc., identifying Centene Corporation; Health Net LLC. (Shaumyan, Alfred) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Health Net Life Insurance Company, Health Net of California Inc.. (Shaumyan, Alfred) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV41356 Receipt No: ACACDC-32462579 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Health Net Life Insurance Company, Health Net of California Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Alfred Shaumyan added to party Health Net Life Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Alfred Shaumyan added to party Health Net of California Inc.(pty:dft))(Shaumyan, Alfred) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.