Brand Surgical Institute v. Regence BlueShield of Washington et al
| Brand Surgical Institute |
| Regence BlueShield of Washington and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv09654 |
| December 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than October 3, 2022. (smo)
|
|
Filing 29
ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/9/2023 at 2:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 1/24/2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. See document for additional pretrial dates and deadlines. (smo)
|
|
Filing 28
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report with respect to the Scheduling Conference and has concluded that the hearing on June 6, 2022 is not necessary. Accordingly, the Scheduling Conference is taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. A separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this case. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
| Filing 27 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Worksheet)(Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 6/6/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (dbe)
|
| Filing 25 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington.(Lewis, Carol) |
|
Filing 24
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order re: Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 13) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The motion is denied. Defendant shall answer the First Amended Complaint within 14 days. See document for details. (smo)
|
|
Filing 23
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION (ECF No. #13 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (ECF No. #13 ) and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion(s), noticed for hearing on February 28, 2022, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
|
| Filing 22 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #13 filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington. (Lewis, Carol) |
| Filing 21 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #13 filed by Plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute. (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 20 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #13 filed by Plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute. (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Miscellaneous Document #14 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. The document is accepted as filed. (smo) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of [Proposed] Order re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #13 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order in re MTD FAC)(Lewis, Carol) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #14 by Regence BlueShield of Washington. The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: For Judicial Notice. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: SEE BELOW UNDER OTHER. Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. PDF document was ONLY the proposed order to motion to dismiss no. 13. FIler refiled motion and ERRONEOUS SET a motion hearing before the Magistrate Judge. Because the filing was only a proposed order, the clerk HAS TERMINATED THIS ERRONEOUS MOTION AND HEARING ONLY. As an alternative, prepare and e-file a formal Notice of Lodging, to be docketed only under its specific event: Notice of Lodging, to which the formal proposed order and or proposed judgment are submitted as their own s Separate Attachment thereto. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) Modified on 1/27/2022 (lc). |
| Filing 15 (TERMINATED AS AN ERRONEOUS FILING SEE G112 DOCKET NO. 17 - PDF IS NOT A MOTION, BUT PROPOSED ORDER) . NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington. Motion set for hearing on 2/28/2022 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Lewis, Carol) Modified on 1/27/2022 (lc). |
| Filing 14 Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #13 (Lewis, Carol) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington. Motion set for hearing on 2/28/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (Lewis, Carol) |
|
Filing 12
Order to Show Cause (LOP) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/1/2022. (smo)
|
| Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant Brand Surgical Institute amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute(Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (vv)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Regence BlueShield of Washington answer now due 1/20/2022, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington.(Lewis, Carol) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| NON CONFORMED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute, upon Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/11/2021, answer due 12/2/2021. Acknowledgment of Service signed by William Von Behren, Attorney for defendant Regence BlueShield. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A-4) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendant Does 1-10, Regence BlueShield of Washington. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Brand Surgical Institute. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Declaration #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 served on 12/14/21. (Lewis, Carol) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington, identifying Regence BlueShield of Washington. (Attorney William E von Behren added to party Regence BlueShield of Washington(pty:dft))(von Behren, William) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Kim Hawthorne re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington. (Lewis, Carol) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington. (Lewis, Carol) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV28947 Receipt No: ACACDC-32475153 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Regence BlueShield of Washington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1 Summons on Complaint, #2 Exhibit A-2 Complaint, #3 Exhibit A-3 Notice of Case Assignment, #4 Exhibit A-3 Notice of Acknowledgement and Receipt) (Attorney Carol B Lewis added to party Regence BlueShield of Washington(pty:dft))(Lewis, Carol) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
