Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited v. Rokit Marketing Inc. et al
Petitioner: Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited
Respondent: Rokit Marketing Inc. and Rok Marketing LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv09695
Filed: December 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Patricia Donahue
Referring Judge: Christina A Snyder
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Petition to Confirm Foreign Arbitral Award #1 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that judgment be entered in this case as follows: The Final Award made by the Arbitrator through the London Court of International Arbitration in the matter of Williams Grand Prix Engineering v. Rokit Marketing Inc. and Rok Marketing LLC, Case No. 204960, on 10/19/2021, is confirmed in all respects. Accordingly, the following relief is awarded: Respondents shall pay to petitioner GBP 26,220,094.25 and USD 1,000,000.00, along with costs incurred in this proceeding. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTES by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS petitioner's petition toconfirm foreign arbitral award #1 . See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTES OF Zoom - Petition to Confirm Foreign Arbitral Award #1 Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court confers with counsel/parties and counsel/parties argue, as stated on the record. The matter is taken under submission. The Court will issue a final ruling. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 SCHEDULING NOTICE (IN CHAMBERS) AND SETTING HEARING BY ZOOM by Judge Christina A. Snyder, re: (IN CHAMBERS) - MINUTES #16 . the 11/28/2022 hearing on the PETITION to Confirm Foreign Arbitral Award #1 at 10:00 AM will be held by Zoom before Christina A. Snyder. Zoom Webinar Information can be found on this Court's Website, under Judge Snyder's Procedures. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Notice of Service on Respondents Pursuant to Court's Minute Order Dated 09/16/2022 filed by Petitioner Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Court MO 9-16-22, #2 Exhibit B (part 1) - Petition Conf Foreign Arb Award filed 12-15-21, #3 Exhibit B (part 2) - Exh A to Petition filed 12-15-21, #4 Exhibit B (part 3) Exh B to Petition filed 12-15-21, #5 Exhibit B (part 4) - Exh C to Petition filed 12-15-21, #6 Exhibit B (part 5) - Exh D to Petition filed 12-15-21, #7 Exhibit B (part 6) - Exh E to Petition filed 12-15-21)(Lowe, Derrick)
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 (IN CHAMBERS) MINUTES - PETITIONERS SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT #15 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS ORDERED that the stay is hereby lifted and the above-referenced action is reinstated on this Courts active caseload. The Court hereby resets the briefing schedule and hearing on the Petition to Confirm Foreign Arbitral Award #1 , as follows: Respondents shall file an opposition brief no later than October 31, 2022; Petitioner shall file a reply brief no later than November 14, 2022; and Hearing on the Petition to Confirm Arbitral Award is set on November 28, 2022, at 10:00 A.M. Petitioner shall serve the Petition to Confirm Arbitral Award and a copy of this minute order on respondents forthwith. Proofs of Service shall be filed thereafter. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-5, Case reopened) (rolm) Modified on 9/19/2022 (rolm). Modified on 11/8/2022 (cj).
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STATUS REPORT QUARTERLY - Supplemental Update filed by Petitioner Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Combine Enterprises - BK Order Granting Relief from Automatic Stay, #2 Exhibit B - ABLE Events - BK Order Grant Relief from Automatic Stay)(Lowe, Derrick)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STATUS REPORT QUARTERLY filed by Petitioner Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited. (Lowe, Derrick)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder, re: MINUTES #12 directed counsel for plaintiff to file quarterly status report commencing on 6/17/2022. To date, no quarterly status report has been received. Plaintiff is ordered to file a quarterly status report on or before 8/18/2022. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) - NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF BANKRUPTCY AND AUTOMATIC STAY OF PROCEEDINGS (Filed 03/16/2022), #10 , #11 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: This Court having been notified that defendants ROKIT MARKETING, INC. and ROK MARKETING, LLC have filed a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Petition on or about March 7, 2022. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is hereby removed from this Court's active caseload until further application by the parties or order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for plaintiff shall file a quarterly status report commencing on June 17, 2022. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. All dates in this action are hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (shb)
March 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE -[Notice Of Pendency Of Bankruptcy And Automatic Stay Of Proceedings (POS Attached)]- filed by Defendant Rok Marketing LLC. (Neale, David)
March 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE filed by Defendant Rokit Marketing Inc.. -[Notice Of Pendency Of Bankruptcy And Automatic Stay Of Proceedings (POS Attached)]- (Neale, David)
March 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) - PETITIONER'S PETITION TO CONFIRM FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD (Filed December 15, 2021) #1 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's Petition to Confirm Foreign Arbitral Award #1 , filed on December 15, 2021. The Court hereby sets the following briefing schedule and hearing: Respondents shall file an opposition brief no later than April 29, 2022; Petitioner shall file a reply brief no later than May 6, 2022; and Hearing on the Petition to Confirm Arbitral Award is set on May 23, 2022, at 10:00 A.M. Petitioner shall serve the Petition to Confirm Arbitral Award and a copy of this minute order on respondents forthwith. Proofs of Service shall be filed thereafter. (bm)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Derrick S Lowe counsel for Petitioner Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited. Adding Derrick S. Lowe as counsel of record for Petitioner for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Petitioner Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited. (Attorney Derrick S Lowe added to party Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited(pty:pet))(Lowe, Derrick)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited, (Baker, Robert)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited. (Baker, Robert)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION to Confirm Foreign Arbitral Award [9 U.S.C. section 207] Receipt No: ACACDC-32484169 - Fee: $402, filed by Petitioner Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - First Partial Award, #2 Exhibit B - Second Partial Award, #3 Exhibit C - Final Award, #4 Exhibit D - First Agreement, #5 Exhibit E - Second Agreement) (Attorney Robert C Baker added to party Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited(pty:pet))(Baker, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited v. Rokit Marketing Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Williams Grand Prix Engineering Limited
Represented By: Robert C Baker
Represented By: Derrick S Lowe
Represented By: Peter Q Ezzell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rokit Marketing Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rok Marketing LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?