Gloria Almanza v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Gloria Almanza |
Smith & Nephew, Inc., DOES 1-100, inclusive and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
2:2021cv09725 |
December 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
Steve Kim |
John F Walter |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 27 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Shaw, John) |
Filing 26 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 11/17/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of J. Sells, #2 Exhibit A to Dec of J. Sells, #3 Exhibit B to Dec of J. Sells, #4 Exhibit C to Dec of J. Sells, #5 Exhibit D to Dec of J. Sells, #6 Declaration of L. Georgantopoulos, #7 Exhibit E to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #8 Exhibit F to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #9 Exhibit G to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #10 Exhibit H to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #11 Exhibit I to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #12 Exhibit J to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #13 Separate Statement of Uncontroverted Facts, #14 Request for Judicial Notice, #15 Proposed Order) (Shaw, John) |
Filing 25 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court hereby STRIKES the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc. #24 . Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, page 6, line 11, the Court requires an extended briefing schedule for motions for summary judgment. The parties must contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk via the Court's chambers email address at MEMF_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov to reserve a hearing date for all motions for summary judgment. Counsel are ordered to review the Court's website located at: http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-maame-ewusi-mensah-frimpong. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 24 [STRICKEN PER COURT ORDER] NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/20/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of J. Sells, #2 Exhibit A to Dec of J. Sells, #3 Exhibit B to Dec of J. Sells, #4 Exhibit C to Dec of J. Sells, #5 Exhibit D to Dec of J. Sells, #6 Declaration of L. Georgantopoulos, #7 Exhibit E to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #8 Exhibit F to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #9 Exhibit G to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #10 Exhibit H to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #11 Exhibit I to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #12 Exhibit J to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #13 Separate Statement of Uncontroverted Facts, #14 Request for Judicial Notice, #15 Proposed Order) (Shaw, John) Modified on 8/26/2022 (kd). |
|
Filing 22 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court is in receipt of the Joint Report filed on May 18, 2022 #21 . As such, the Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar, with no appearances necessary on May 26, 2022. The Court will issue the Scheduling Order based solely on the parties Joint Rule 26(f) Report pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 21 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc... (Shaw, John) |
Filing 20 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a current copy of the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet attached to the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference, no later than seven (7) days prior to the Scheduling Conference. The Order Setting Scheduling Conference is available on Judge Frimpong's website. This Worksheet should include any existing deadlines associated with this case, in addition to proposed Pretrial and Trial dates. The Court will schedule Final Pretrial Conferences and Trials no earlier than August 2022. The parties are required to meet and confer regarding their availability prior to submitting this Joint worksheet. All hearings shall be in person unless the parties make, and the Court grants, a request to appear via video. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 19 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court continues the Scheduling Conference to 05/26/2022 at 10:00 AM. Counsel are ordered to take notice of this new date. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 17 STATUS REPORT Joint Case Management Statement filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Shaw, John) |
|
Filing 15 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong. The Court hereby continues the Scheduling Conference to March 10, 2022 at 9:00 AM. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kd) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 Days, filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc... (Shaw, John) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Shaw, John) |
|
Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 100, inclusive. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 DECLARATION of John Shaw as Lead Counsel filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Shaw, John) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Standing Order filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Shaw, John) |
|
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc in Los Angeles Superior Court on 3/3/2021, attached as Exhibit E. (jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Gloria Almanza in Los Angeles Superior Court on 12/23/2020, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc. identifying Smith & Nephew, PLC as Corporate Parent. (Shaw, John) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc., identifying Smith & Nephew, PLC. (Shaw, John) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20AVCV00913 Receipt No: ACACDC-32489632 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of L. Georgantopoulos ISO Removal, #2 Exhibit A to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #3 Exhibit B to Dec of L. Georgantopoulos, #4 Exhibit C to Dec of L. Geogantopoulos, #5 Exhibit D to Dec of L. Geogantopoulos, #6 Exhibit E to Dec of L. Geogantopoulos, #7 Exhibit F to Dec of L. Geogantopoulos, #8 Exhibit G to Dec of L. Geogantopoulos, #9 Exhibit H to Dec of L. Geogantopoulos, #10 Exhibit I to Dec of L. Geogantopoulos, #11 Exhibit J to Dec of L. Geogantopoulos, #12 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney John W Shaw added to party Smith & Nephew, Inc.(pty:dft))(Shaw, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.