Anthony Alvarado et al v. City of San Gabriel et al
Anthony Alvarado, David Alvarado, Sr. and Diane Anaya |
City of San Gabriel, DOES 1-10 and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
2:2021cv09742 |
December 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Alka Sagar |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/11/2022. (tj) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant City of San Gabriel.(Attorney Emily B Suhr added to party City of San Gabriel(pty:dft))(Suhr, Emily) |
Filing 11 DECLARATION of Anthony Alvarado as successor in interest to David Alvarado, Jr. pursuant to CCP 377.32 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Alvarado. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Alvarado Death Certificate)(Le, Hang) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Alvarado, Diane Anaya, David Alvarado, Sr., upon Defendant City of San Gabriel served on 12/29/2021, answer due 1/19/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessica Zhao - Administration Assistant-Person in Charge of Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Galipo, Dale) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant City of San Gabriel. (jtil) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiffs Anthony Alvarado, David Alvarado, Sr., Diane Anaya. (Galipo, Dale) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Galipo, Dale) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Anthony Alvarado, David Alvarado, Sr., Diane Anaya. (Galipo, Dale) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32493635 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiffs Anthony Alvarado, Diane Anaya, David Alvarado, Sr.. (Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party Anthony Alvarado(pty:pla), Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party David Alvarado, Sr.(pty:pla), Attorney Dale K Galipo added to party Diane Anaya(pty:pla))(Galipo, Dale) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.