Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz v. City of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz
Defendant: City of Los Angeles, Detective Freddie Arroyo, Detective Christian Mrakich, DOES 1-25, and Does 1-25, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv09754
Filed: December 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 31, 2022 Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Plaintiff Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz.. (Sharpe, Daniel)
January 18, 2022 Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Freddie Arroyo, Christian Mrakich, (Shepherd, Surekha)
January 18, 2022 Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Freddie Arroyo, Christian Mrakich.(Attorney Surekha A Shepherd added to party Freddie Arroyo(pty:dft), Attorney Surekha A Shepherd added to party Christian Mrakich(pty:dft))(Shepherd, Surekha)
January 10, 2022 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz, upon Defendant Freddie Arroyo served on 12/27/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Detective S. Johnson, authorized to accept service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Due Diligence)(Sharpe, Daniel)
January 10, 2022 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz, upon Defendant Christian Mrakich served on 12/27/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Detective S. Johnson, authorized to accept service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Due Diligence)(Sharpe, Daniel)
December 27, 2021 Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 as to Defendant Freddie Arroyo, City of Los Angeles, Christian Mrakich. (iv)
December 22, 2021 Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz. (Sharpe, Daniel)
December 22, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz, identifying Defendant City of Los Angeles, Defendant Detective Freddie Arroyo, Defendant Christian Mrakich. (Sharpe, Daniel)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/10/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 2/24/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
December 22, 2021 Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 22, 2021 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by DEFENDANT CITY OF LOS ANGELES, by and through the Los Angeles Police Department City of Los Angeles.(Shepherd, Surekha)
December 22, 2021 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by DEFENDANT City of Los Angeles, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on December 22, 2021. (Shepherd, Surekha)
December 20, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
December 20, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
December 20, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (ghap)
December 17, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Freddie Arroyo, City of Los Angeles, Does 1-25, incluisve, Christian Mrakich.(Filing fee $ 402) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz. (ghap)
December 17, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Shepherd, Surekha)
December 17, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT City of Los Angeles, (Shepherd, Surekha)
December 17, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV33751 Receipt No: ACACDC-32497744 - Fee: $402, filed by DEFENDANT City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court - Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - State Court - Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - State Court - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit 4 - State Court - Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location, #5 Exhibit 5 - State Court - Notice of Case Assignment - Unlimited Civil Case, #6 Exhibit 6 - State Court - Notice of Case Management Conference, #7 Exhibit 7 - State Court - Summons - City of Los Angeles) (Attorney Surekha A Shepherd added to party City of Los Angeles (pty:dft))(Shepherd, Surekha)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz v. City of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alfonso Jesus Flores Resendiz
Represented By: Daniel Christian Sharpe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Los Angeles
Represented By: Surekha A Shepherd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective Freddie Arroyo
Represented By: Surekha A Shepherd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detective Christian Mrakich
Represented By: Surekha A Shepherd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-25,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?