Scott William Hargis v. Giggster, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Scott William Hargis
Defendant: Giggster, Inc. and Mint Locations, LLC
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Gail M Title
Case Number: 2:2021cv09775
Filed: December 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2022 Filing 43 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Order) (lom)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE #40 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
August 5, 2022 Filing 41 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to Dismiss Case #40 . The following error(s) was/were found: Leonard Grayver has sign the stipulation, but our records shows that he is NOT admitted in Central District, USDC. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) Modified on 8/5/2022 (lom).
August 4, 2022 Filing 40 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis.(Rollin, Matthew)
July 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement #38 , indicating that the case has settled in its entirety, this action is placed on inactive status. By August 12, 2022, the parties shall file a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of this action. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. (lc)
July 13, 2022 Filing 38 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis. (Grossbardt, Jonah)
April 28, 2022 Filing 37 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Gail M Title has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst)
April 27, 2022 Filing 36 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Gail Title may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 7/12/2022 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis(Rollin, Matthew)
April 1, 2022 Filing 35 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 Amended filed by Defendant Mint Locations, LLC.(Bogert, Jeffrey)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. If the parties have not selected and obtained the consent of a Panel Mediator within twenty-one (21) days, the ADR Program will assign one. (lom)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 33 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (JURY TRIAL) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. This Order is to advise the parties and counsel of the schedule that will govern this case. THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS VACATED. Schedule of Trial and Pretrial Dates: Final Pretrial Conference set for set for 3/20/2023 01:30 PM; Jury Trial set for 4/11/2023 09:00 AM; 03/27/23 Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 4/3/23 at 1:30 p.m. SEE THE LAST PAGE OF THIS ORDER FOR THE SPECIFIED DATES. These dates and requirements are firm. (lom)
March 29, 2022 Filing 32 INITIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 26(A)(1) filed by Defendant Mint Locations, LLC (Bogert, Jeffrey)
March 28, 2022 Filing 31 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 Days, filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis.. (Rollin, Matthew)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES' STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT MINT LOCATIONS, LLC TO AMEND ITS ANSWER #29 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court hereby ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED, and Defendant, Mint Locations, LLC will have up to and including April 1, 2022, to Amend its Answer. (lom)
March 18, 2022 Filing 29 Joint STIPULATION to Amend Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #17 filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rollin, Matthew)
March 17, 2022 Filing 28 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: First APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Giggster, Inc. #25 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Answer on file. Giggster, Inc. filed answer 3/16/2022 docket no. 26. (lc)
March 16, 2022 Filing 27 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Giggster, Inc., identifying Giggster, Inc.. (Davidson, Benjamin)
March 16, 2022 Filing 26 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Giggster, Inc..(Attorney Benjamin Davidson added to party Giggster, Inc.(pty:dft))(Davidson, Benjamin)
March 16, 2022 Filing 25 First APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Giggster, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A) (Rollin, Matthew)
March 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff(s) is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than March 16, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant-Giggster, Inc. In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will take precedence. Answer by the defendant(s). Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc)
February 28, 2022 Filing 23 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Giggster, Inc. answer now due 3/14/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis.(Rollin, Matthew)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES #21 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court thereby ORDERS that the Stipulation is approved, and Plaintiff shall have until March 19, 2022 in which to file his Motion to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses. (lom)
February 9, 2022 Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File a Motion to Strike Defendant's Affirmative Defenses filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rollin, Matthew)
February 9, 2022 Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis, upon Defendant Giggster, Inc. served on 2/4/2022, answer due 2/25/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Molly Grayver, Wife/Administrator of Registered Agent, Leonard Grayver, for Giggster, Inc. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Grossbardt, Jonah)
January 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for April, 4 2022 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
January 27, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mint Locations, LLC, identifying Mint Locations, LLC. (Bogert, Jeffrey)
January 27, 2022 Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Mint Locations, LLC.(Attorney Jeffrey C Bogert added to party Mint Locations, LLC(pty:dft))(Bogert, Jeffrey)
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT MINT LOCATIONS,LLC TO FILE ITS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TO JANUARY 27, 2022 #15 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
January 20, 2022 Filing 15 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Mint Locations, LLC answer now due 1/27/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Grossbardt, Jonah)
January 19, 2022 Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargisto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, #13 (Grossbardt, Jonah)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION.Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than January 20, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant. In the event both documents are filed before the above date:, the answer will take precedence. Answer by the defendant(s). Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc)
January 3, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis, upon Defendant Mint Locations, LLC served on 12/27/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cindi Osborn - Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
December 20, 2021 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Mint Locations, LLC. (car)
December 20, 2021 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Giggster, Inc. (car)
December 20, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
December 20, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
December 20, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car)
December 17, 2021 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 17, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis, (Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 17, 2021 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Scott William Hargis. (Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 17, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis. (Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32500919 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Scott William Hargis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Works, #2 Exhibit 2 - Registration, #3 Exhibit 3 - Infringement) (Attorney Jonah Adam Grossbardt added to party Scott William Hargis(pty:pla))(Grossbardt, Jonah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott William Hargis v. Giggster, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott William Hargis
Represented By: Jonah Adam Grossbardt
Represented By: Matthew Laurence Rollin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Giggster, Inc.
Represented By: Benjamin Davidson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mint Locations, LLC
Represented By: Jeffrey C Bogert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Gail M Title
Represented By: Gail M. Title
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?