Garey C. Gomez v. Spadia, Inc.
Plaintiff: Garey C. Gomez
Defendant: Spadia, Inc. Spadia, Inc. dba Bath Beyond doing business as Bath Beyond and Spadia, Inc. doing business as Bath Beyond
Case Number: 2:2021cv09780
Filed: December 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Margo A Rocconi
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 501
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Spadia, Inc., (Cha, Alex)
February 10, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint filed by Defendant Spadia, Inc #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (2) Counsel shall file the Notice of Interested Parties on or before 2/12/2022. Failure to file the notice may result in the document being stricken. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp)
February 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/25/2022. (tj)
February 8, 2022 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Spadia, Inc..(Cha, Alex)
January 10, 2022 Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Garey C. Gomez answer now due 2/8/2022, filed by Defendant Spadia, Inc..(Attorney Alex Myung Cha added to party Spadia, Inc. (pty:dft))(Cha, Alex)
December 29, 2021 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Garey C. Gomez, upon Defendant Spadia, Inc. served on 12/21/2021, answer due 1/11/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jihoon Park, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
December 20, 2021 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Spadia, Inc. (lh)
December 20, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
December 20, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
December 20, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (lh)
December 17, 2021 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Garey C. Gomez. (Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 17, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Garey C. Gomez, (Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 17, 2021 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Garey C. Gomez. (Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 17, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Garey C. Gomez. (Grossbardt, Jonah)
December 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32501527 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Garey C. Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Registration, #2 Exhibit 2 - Infringement) (Attorney Jonah Adam Grossbardt added to party Garey C. Gomez(pty:pla))(Grossbardt, Jonah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garey C. Gomez v. Spadia, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garey C. Gomez
Represented By: Jonah Adam Grossbardt
Represented By: Matthew Laurence Rollin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spadia, Inc. Spadia, Inc. dba Bath Beyond doing business as Bath Beyond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spadia, Inc. doing business as Bath Beyond
Represented By: Alex Myung Cha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?