United States of America v. 2849.09758934 in Monero Digital Currency et al
United States of America |
2849.09758934 in Monero Digital Currency, 0.12554563 in Bitcoin Digital Currency and 56,467.00 in U.S. Currency |
2:2021cv09819 |
December 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Ronald SW Lew |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Extending Time to Respond to Complaint #13 , that potential claimants David Anthony Glenn, and any other potential claimant's time to file a claim to the defendant assets is extended to 2/25/2022. (jp) |
Filing 13 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dan Boyle, #2 Proposed Order) (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 12 SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, by Publication on 12/27/2021 and 12/28/2021 upon Defendant All Defendants. Publication was made in the www.forfeiture.gov. (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer Appointing U.S Customs and Border Protection as Substitute Custodian in Place of The U.S. Marshals Service #4 . See Order for specifics. (jp) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-09819 DSF(AFMx). (rn) |
Filing 8 WARRANT for seizure of 2849.09758934 in Monero Digital Currency, 0.12554563 in Bitcoin Digital Currency, and $56,467.00 in U.S. Currency issued on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (lh) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
Filing 4 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Appointing the United States Customs and Border Protection as Substitute Custodian in Place of the U.S. Marshals Service filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Warrant for Seizure on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Boyle, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attorney Daniel G. Boyle added to party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(pty:pla))(Boyle, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.