Lucine Trim v. Ethos Technologies Inc. et al
| Lucine Trim |
| Ethos Technologies Inc. and Does 1-10 inclusive |
| 2:2021cv09857 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| John F Walter |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ethos Technologies Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lucine Trim, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Lucine Trim. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lucine Trim. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32521495 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Lucine Trim. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Lucine Trim(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
