Hee Soon Park v. Lawrence H. Sim et al
| Hee Soon Park |
| Lawrence H. Sim and Does 1 through 10 |
| 2:2021cv09869 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: On 12/23/2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why it should not decline supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim in light of the exceptional circumstances described in the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F.4th 1202 (9th Cir. 2021) #10 . Plaintiff's response consists largely of generic, irrelevant arguments and does not meaningfully address the Arroyo court's comity concerns #11 . For the reasons in this order, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim and dismisses the claim without prejudice. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Hee Soon Parkto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, #10 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: This case is still at a very early stage, and this Court has not yet addressed or adjudicated the merits of any of Plaintiff's claims. This appears to be a case in which the Court should decline supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim under Section 1367(c)(4) to protect the comity interests identified in Arroyo v. Rosas, No. 19-55974, 2021 WL 5858598 (9th Cir. Dec. 10, 2021). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff within 14 days after entry of this Order to show cause in writing why the Court should not dismiss without prejudice her Unruh Act claim under Section 1367(c)(4). If Plaintiff fails to file a response within 14 days after entry of this Order, the Court will decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her Unruh Act claim, and the Unruh Act claim will be automatically dismissed without prejudice without further order of the Court. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
|
Filing 9
CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Lawrence H. Sim. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Hee Soon Park. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hee Soon Park. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32524052 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Hee Soon Park(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
