Adam Tyson v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Adam Tyson |
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC |
2:2021cv09924 |
December 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Karen L Stevenson |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 11 ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT #10 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC's deadline to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended to February 24, 2022. (iv) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC answer now due 2/24/2022, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Mehgan Gallagher in Support of Stipulation to Extend Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA LLC's Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adam Tyson, upon Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC served on 1/13/2022, answer due 2/3/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Ruiz, Process Specialist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Adam Tyson. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Adam Tyson, (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Adam Tyson. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32531793 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Adam Tyson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Kevin Y Jacobson added to party Adam Tyson(pty:pla))(Jacobson, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Adam Tyson v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Adam Tyson | |
Represented By: | Kevin Y Jacobson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC | |
Represented By: | Soheyl Tahsildoost |
Represented By: | Mehgan Gallagher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.