Todd Williamson v. Marketplace At Hollywood Park, L.P. et al
| Todd Williamson |
| MARKETPLACE AT HOLLYWOOD PARK, L.P. and DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv09943 |
| December 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| John E McDermott |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Marketplace At Hollywood Park, L.P. answer now due 3/11/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Marketplace At Hollywood Park, L.P..(Attorney Edson K McClellan added to party Marketplace At Hollywood Park, L.P.(pty:dft))(McClellan, Edson) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Todd Williamson, upon Defendant Marketplace At Hollywood Park, L.P. served on 1/31/2022, answer due 2/22/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon WILLIAM W. HUGHES, JR. - Agent Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hakimi, Anoush) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Todd Williamsonto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,, Order to Show Cause,,, #11 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Peter Shahriari, #2 Declaration of Todd Williamson)(Steven, Laura) |
Filing 11
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. In responding to this Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff shall identify the amount of statutory damages Plaintiff seeks to recover. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by 1/18/2022. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of any such claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c). Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Marketplace At Hollywood Park, L.P. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Todd Williamson, (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Todd Williamson. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Todd Williamson. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32535160 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Todd Williamson. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party Todd Williamson(pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
