Anthony Romero Sayson v. BNSF Railway Company et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Romero Sayson
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv09966
Filed: December 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L Abrams
Referring Judge: Dale S Fischer
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer re Joint Stipulation of Dismissal #20 . Each party is to bear its own fees and costs. The Court directs the clerk to close the case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) See Order for specifics. (jp)
January 18, 2022 Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Sommerfeld, Amanda)
January 10, 2022 Filing 19 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Donald J. Munro to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant BNSF Railway Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32578686) #15 by Clerk of Court to Judge Dale S. Fischer. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by 1/20/2022. (jp)
January 7, 2022 Filing 18 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Donald J. Munro to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant BNSF Railway Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32578686) #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed. Case information is incomplete. DJ and MJ initials missing on application and proposed order. (lt)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer APPROVING Stipulation to Continue #16 Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss #13 to 2/14/2022 at 01:30 PM., and Adopting Proposed Briefing Schedule. See Order for specifics. (jp)
January 6, 2022 Filing 16 STIPULATION to Continue HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND ADOPTING PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE from January 31, 2022 to February 14, 2022 Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Romero Sayson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF ALLEN FEGHALI IN SUPPORT OF JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, #2 Proposed Order APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND ADOPTING PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE)(Nabiev, Enzo)
January 6, 2022 Filing 15 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER DKT ENTRY NO. #19 ] - APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Donald J. Munro to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant BNSF Railway Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32578686) filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Sommerfeld, Amanda). Modified on 1/10/2022 (jp).
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 2/28/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
January 3, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company. Motion set for hearing on 1/31/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint, #2 Proposed Order) (Sommerfeld, Amanda)
December 29, 2021 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only,, #9 served on 12/29/2021. (Wooley, Koree)
December 29, 2021 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company, re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 served on 12/29/2021. (Wooley, Koree)
December 29, 2021 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice (Other) #4 served on 12/28/2021. (Wooley, Koree)
December 29, 2021 Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (jre)
December 29, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Donald J Munro. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car)
December 29, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
December 29, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
December 29, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (car)
December 28, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Anthony Romero Sayson, upon Defendant BNSF Railway Company served on 11/29/2021, answer due 12/20/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Service, Received by John Montejo, Intake Specialist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. Filed in State Court on 12/6/2021 Submitted with Attachment 6 Exhibit F to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
December 28, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants BNSF Railway Company, Does 1 through 10, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Anthony Romero Sayson. Filed in State Court on 11/17/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
December 28, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal with Superior Court filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Wooley, Koree)
December 28, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company, identifying Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC; Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. (Wooley, Koree)
December 28, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Wooley, Koree)
December 28, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior, case number 21STCV42288 Receipt No: ACACDC-32538870 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant BNSF Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Class Action Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum, #4 Exhibit D - Summons on Complaint, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Case Assignment, #6 Exhibit F - Proof of Service, #7 Exhibit G - 12-10-21 Minute Order, #8 Exhibit H - Clerk's Certificate of Mailing Order, #9 Exhibit I - Initial Status Conference Order) (Attorney Koree B Wooley added to party BNSF Railway Company(pty:dft))(Wooley, Koree)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anthony Romero Sayson v. BNSF Railway Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Romero Sayson
Represented By: Allen Victor Feghali
Represented By: Enzo Dalgat Nabiev
Represented By: Kane Moon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company
Represented By: Koree B Wooley
Represented By: Amanda C Sommerfeld
Represented By: Charles W Shewmake
Represented By: Donald J. Munro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?