Jesus Alvarado et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Jesus Alvarado and Maria Perez |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv09970 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL, #12 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: Based on the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all parties, is hereby ORDERED dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiff Jesus Alvarado. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jacobson, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 SCHEDULING NOTICE (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, re: Notice of Settlement #10 received in the above-referenced action. This is to bring to your attention that the Notice of Settlement does not vacate or continue dates and deadlines. The parties need to make a request, attaching a proposed order, separate from the Notice of Settlement. Currently, there is a Scheduling Conference #9 calendared for 5/3/2022 at 10:00 AM. On the Court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference is continued to 6/21/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Scheduling Conference is set for 5/3/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. (cj) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/22/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Jesus Alvarado, Maria Perez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV43320 Receipt No: ACACDC-32539740 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
