Martin J. Walsh v. Lifovum Fertility Management, LLC
Martin J. Walsh |
Secretary of Labor martin j walsh |
Lifovum Fertility Management, LLC |
2:2021mc00991 |
June 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Otis D Wright |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support of the Secretarys Petition to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued by the Employee Benefits Security Administration of The United States Department of Labor Re: Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Garcia, Norman) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant martin j walsh. (Garcia, Norman) |
Filing 1 PETITION to Enforce Administrative Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued by the Employee Benefits Security Administration of the United States Department of Labor No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Petitioner martin j walsh. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Supervisory Investigator Angel Mariscal, #2 Declaration of Investigator David Gonzalez, #3 Declaration of Regional Director Crisanta Johnson, #4 Declaration of Senior Trial Attorney Norman E. Garcia, #5 Proposed Order) (Attorney Norman E Garcia added to party martin j walsh(pty:bkmov))(Garcia, Norman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.