In Re Ex Parte Application of K-fee System GmbH
K-fee System GmbH |
Nespresso USA, Inc. and Nestle Holdings, Inc. doing business as Nestle USA, Inc. |
In Re Ex Parte Application of K-fee System GmbH |
2:2021mc01011 |
July 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
George H Wu |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 REPLY in support of K-Fee System GmbH's Application for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in Foreign Proceedings filed by Movant K-fee System GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Yuri Mikulka)(Mikulka, Yuri) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Respondents Nespresso USA, Inc., Nestle Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Andrew Glass In Support of Nespresso's Opposition To Application Of K-fee System GMBH for An Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782, #2 Declaration of Yves Bizollon In Support of Nespresso's Opposition to Application of K-fee System GMBH for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782, #3 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Yves Bizollon In Support of Nespresso's Opposition to Application of K-fee System GMBH for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782, #4 Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Yves Bizollon In Support of Nespresso's Opposition to Application of K-fee System GMBH for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782)(Attorney Wayne Mitchell Barsky added to party Nespresso USA, Inc.(pty:res), Attorney Wayne Mitchell Barsky added to party Nestle Holdings, Inc.(pty:res))(Barsky, Wayne) |
Filing 11 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge George H. Wu: GRANTING #9 Non-Resident Attorney Theodore Stevenson III APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Applicant K-fee System GmbH, designating Yuri Mikulka as local counsel. (lt) |
Filing 10 MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER RE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, re: Application #1 . Nespresso may file an opposition to the application on or before August 5, 2021. K-fee may file a reply within 14 days after service of the opposition. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 9 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Theodore Stevenson III to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Movant K-fee System GmbH (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31624643) filed by Applicant K-fee System GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Theodore Stevenson, III added to party K-fee System GmbH(pty:mov)) (Stevenson, Theodore) |
Filing 8 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:21-cv-03402 GW(AGRx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams and Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr to Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-mc-01011 GW(AGRx). Signed by Judge George H. Wu (rn) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Applicant K-fee System GmbH, re Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on July 7, 2021. (Mikulka, Yuri) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Theodore Stevenson on behalf on Movant. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type CV to case type MC because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:21-mc-1011 SB (PLAx). The previous case number, 2:21-cv-5433, is hereby terminated. (ghap) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Petitioner k-fee System GmbH identifying Kruger GmbH & Co. KG as Corporate Parent. (Mikulka, Yuri) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner k-fee System GmbH. (Mikulka, Yuri) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION Ex Parte Application of K-fee System GmbH for an Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery from Nespresso USA and Nestle Holdings for Use in Foreign Proceedings Receipt No: ACACDC-31576219 - Fee: $402, filed by Applicant k-fee System GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Cordula Schumacher, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Declaration of Yuri Mikulka, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Proposed Order) (Attorney Yuri Mikulka added to party k-fee System GmbH(pty:inre))(Mikulka, Yuri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.