Beattie B. Ashmore et al v. Skip Dawson et al
Plaintiff: Beattie B. Ashmore
Defendant: Skip Dawson and S and S Holding Company Inc
Case Number: 2:2021mc01075
Filed: October 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2022 Filing 5 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Judgment NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Vacate #2 filed by Plaintiff Beattie B. Ashmore. (Brown, Ethan)
February 28, 2022 Filing 4 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Judgment NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Vacate #2 filed by Plaintiff Beattie B. Ashmore. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF SARA C. COLN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF MOTION & MOTION TO VACATE OR SET ASIDE THE OCTOBER 7, 2021 JUDGMENT OF THIS DISTRICT COURT REGARDING THE SISTER STATE JUDGMENT DATED JUNE 24, 2021 ENTERED AGAINST THEM IN THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTH CAROLINA IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF)(Attorney Ethan J Brown added to party Beattie B. Ashmore(pty:pla))(Brown, Ethan)
November 17, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because subsequent filings have changed the nature of the case. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:21-cv-09010 SVW (AFMx). The previous case number, 2:21-mc-01075-UA, is hereby terminated. (lh)
November 15, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Set Aside Judgment , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Vacate filed by Attorney for Defendants Skip Dawson, S and S Holding Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Civ-30) (Attorney Andrew P Altholz added to party Skip Dawson(pty:dft), Attorney Andrew P Altholz added to party S and S Holding Company Inc (pty:dft)) (Altholz, Andrew)
October 7, 2021 Filing 1 REGISTRATION OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT received from USDC for the District of South Carolina, case number 6:20-cv-3600-BHH entered in the sending district on 6/24/2021. Entered in this district on 10/7/2021, filed by Plaintiff Beattie B. Ashmore. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beattie B. Ashmore et al v. Skip Dawson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beattie B. Ashmore
Represented By: Lisa E Spiwak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Skip Dawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S and S Holding Company Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?