John Oberg et al v. Twinedge, Inc. et al
| John Oberg, Steve Walsh, Todd Christenson, Dustyn Williams and Laurie East |
| Twinedge, Inc., Christina Schweiger and Richard Bagdonas |
| 2:2021mc01117 |
| December 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Alka Sagar |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Pursuant to the Notice of Withdrawal of Motion Related to Subpoena from Another District, filed on January 7, 2022 (Docket No. #6 ), the Order Setting Briefing Schedule (Docket No. #4 ) is hereby VACATED. The case is now CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (afe) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 6 Notice of Withdrawal of MISC - Motion Related to Subpoena from Another District,, #1 filed by Defendants Richard Bagdonas, Christina Schweiger, Twinedge, Inc.. (Kelley, Garland) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Garland Aycuff Kelley counsel for Defendants Richard Bagdonas, Christina Schweiger, Twinedge, Inc.. Adding Garland A. Kelley as counsel of record for Twinedge, Inc., Christina Schweiger, and Richard Bagdonas for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Twinedge, Inc., Christina Schweiger, and Richard Bagdonas. (Attorney Garland Aycuff Kelley added to party Richard Bagdonas(pty:dft), Attorney Garland Aycuff Kelley added to party Christina Schweiger(pty:dft), Attorney Garland Aycuff Kelley added to party Twinedge, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kelley, Garland) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE (In Chambers): Order Setting Briefing Schedule on Motion to Quash Subpoena Issued to Non-Party by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, re: Motion Related to Subpoena from Another District #1 . Defendants shall file an Opposition to the Motion no later than January 14, 2022; Plaintiffs shall file a Reply no later than January 21, 2022. The motion will be under submission upon the filing of the Reply. (see document for further details) (hr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type CV to case type MC because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:21-mc-01117 MWF (ASx). The previous case number, 2:21-cv-09781, is hereby terminated. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 MOTION RELATED TO A SUBPOENA FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT Receipt No: ACACDC-32501693 - Fee: $49, filed by Plaintiffs Todd Christenson, Steve Walsh, John Oberg, Dustyn Williams, Laurie East. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Oberg Declaration, #2 Declaration Murphey Declaration, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A-1, #4 Exhibit Exhibit A-2, #5 Exhibit Exhibit A-3, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Scott W Davenport added to party Todd Christenson(pty:bkmov), Attorney Scott W Davenport added to party Laurie East(pty:bkmov), Attorney Scott W Davenport added to party John Oberg(pty:bkmov), Attorney Scott W Davenport added to party Steve Walsh(pty:bkmov), Attorney Scott W Davenport added to party Dustyn Williams(pty:bkmov))(Davenport, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
