Christopher Jackson v. County of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: Christopher Jackson
Defendant: Los Angeles County, Anchorage 47, Michael Blenk, Doe Defendants and County of Los Angeles
Case Number: 2:2022cv00030
Filed: January 3, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R Gary Klausner
Referring Judge: Margo A Rocconi
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2022 Filing 31 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Christopher Jackson amending Complaint - (Discovery), JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit I)(Salazar, Theida)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike [DE #10 and #15 ] by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend and DENIES the Motion to Strike as moot. The only remaining claim is unlawful seizure under 42 USC Section 1983. Plaintiff has until 3/4/2022 to file a first amended complaint. (See attached Civil Minutes for further specifics). (jp)
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 29 (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #10 , and Defendants' Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint #15 , calendared for hearing on February 7, 2022, have been taken under submission and off the motion calendar. No appearances by counsel are necessary. The court will review the matter without hearing any further arguments in person or on paper. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 24, 2022 Filing 28 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike portions of Plaintiff's Complaint #15 Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Srike Portions of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendants Michael Blenk, County of Los Angeles. (Sharaby, Farid)
January 24, 2022 Filing 27 REPLY In Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #10 Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendants Michael Blenk, County of Los Angeles. (Sharaby, Farid)
January 21, 2022 Filing 26 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike portions of Plaintiff's Complaint #15 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson. (Salazar, Theida)
January 21, 2022 Filing 25 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #10 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint)(Salazar, Theida)
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Oppositions #22 , #23 , for the following reasons: Oppositions contain single-spaced text. Counsel shall properly refile the documents by 12 noon on January 21, 2022, otherwise the documents will not considered by the Court. See LR 11-3.6. If counsel fails to remedy its failure to adhere to the the Local Rules when it re-files, the Court no longer allow refiling and will consider both motions to be unopposed. (jp)
January 19, 2022 Filing 23 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 1/20/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #24 ] - Opposition Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #10 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson. (Salazar, Theida). Modified on 1/20/2022 (jp).
January 19, 2022 Filing 22 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 1/20/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #24 ] - Opposition Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike portions of Plaintiff's Complaint #15 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson. (Salazar, Theida). Modified on 1/20/2022 (jp).
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Opposition #19 , Opposition #20 , for the following reasons: Oppositions contain single-spaced text. Counsel shall properly refile the documents by 12 noon on January 19, 2022, otherwise the documents will not be considered by the Court. See LR 11-3.6. (jp)
January 18, 2022 Filing 20 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 1/19/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #21 ] - Opposition to Motion to Strike Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike portions of Plaintiff's Complaint #15 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson. (Salazar, Theida). Modified on 1/19/2022 (jp).
January 18, 2022 Filing 19 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 1/19/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #21 ] - OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #10 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson. (Salazar, Theida). Modified on 1/19/2022 (jp).
January 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: to Motion to Strike #16 , Opposition to Motion #17 , for the following reasons: Memorandum exceeding 10 pages is lacking table of authorities; single-spaced text - LR 11.3-6. Counsel may properly refile the documents by 3:00 pm on January 18, 2022. (jp)
January 17, 2022 Filing 17 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 1/18/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #18 ] - OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint #10 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson. (Salazar, Theida). Modified on 1/18/2022 (jp).
January 17, 2022 Filing 16 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 1/18/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #18 ] - to Motion to Strike Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike portions of Plaintiff's Complaint #15 filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson. (Salazar, Theida). Modified on 1/18/2022 (jp).
January 11, 2022 Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike portions of Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendants Michael Blenk, County of Los Angeles. Motion set for hearing on 2/7/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Farid A. Sharaby, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Strike) (Sharaby, Farid)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge R. Gary Klausner: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plainitff's Complaint #11 , for the following reasons: Contains single-spaced text. LR 11-3.6 Counsel may properly refile the motion not later than 3:00 pm on January 11, 2022. (jp)
January 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/14/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 3/21/2022 at at 9:00 am. (sw)
January 10, 2022 Filing 12 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plainitff's Complaint #11 filed by Defendants Michael Blenk, County of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Request for Judicial Notice)(Sharaby, Farid)
January 10, 2022 Filing 11 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER DATED ON 1/11/2022, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #14 ] - NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Plainitff's Complaint filed by Defendants Michael Blenk, County of Los Angeles. Motion set for hearing on 2/7/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Farid A. Sharaby, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Strike) (Sharaby, Farid) .Modified on 1/11/2022 (jp).
January 10, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendants Michael Blenk, County of Los Angeles. Motion set for hearing on 2/7/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Sharaby, Farid)
January 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
January 7, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:22-cv-00030-RGK-MARx. (aco)
January 6, 2022 Filing 7 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendants Michael Blenk, County of Los Angeles. (Hurrell, Thomas)
January 5, 2022 Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm)
January 4, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh)
January 3, 2022 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Anchorage 47, Michael Blenk, County of Los Angeles, Doe Defendants, filed by Plaintiff Christopher Jackson. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/14/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
January 3, 2022 Filing 4 Certificate of Service of Notice to Adverse Party of Notice of Removal to Federal Court re: Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 (Hurrell, Thomas)
January 3, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Anchorage 47, Michael Blenk, Los Angeles County, identifying Christopher Jackson, County of Los Angeles (erroneously sued and served as Los Angeles County and Anchorage 47) and Michael Blenk. (Hurrell, Thomas)
January 3, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Anchorage 47, Michael Blenk, Los Angeles County. (Hurrell, Thomas)
January 3, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV21939 Receipt No: ACACDC-32558207 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Michael Blenk, Anchorage 47, Los Angeles County. (Attorney Thomas C Hurrell added to party Anchorage 47(pty:dft), Attorney Thomas C Hurrell added to party Michael Blenk(pty:dft), Attorney Thomas C Hurrell added to party Los Angeles County(pty:dft))(Hurrell, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christopher Jackson v. County of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Jackson
Represented By: Theida Salazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles County
Represented By: Thomas C Hurrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anchorage 47
Represented By: Thomas C Hurrell
Represented By: Farid Ahmed Sharaby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Blenk
Represented By: Thomas C Hurrell
Represented By: Farid Ahmed Sharaby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe Defendants
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Los Angeles
Represented By: Farid Ahmed Sharaby
Represented By: Thomas C Hurrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?