Yongin Jo v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
| Yongin JO |
| United States Department of Homeland Security, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
| 2:2022cv00052 |
| January 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) or (c) filed as] NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss mandamus action 2:22-cv-00052-FLA-AFM, NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case 2:22-cv-00052-FLA-AFM filed by plaintiff Yongin Jo. (Doi, Genie) Modified on 2/17/2022 (lom). |
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yongin Jo, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Mail Room. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Mail Room. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Doi, Genie) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA,,, (30 day) #16 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document forthwith. (lc) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (30 day) #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of S/C Returned Executed as to USA. filer used incorrect event of Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (30 day) which is ONLY for Freedom of Information Act cases of which this case is not. Filer was advised of correct event in previous deficiency notice as well. Due to incorrect event, docket text is incomplete and incorrect. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yongin Jo, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Olulenna, Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Mail Room. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. , PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yongin Jo, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to R. Olulenna, Civil Process Clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. The Attorney Generals Office of the United States was NOT served. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Mail Room. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Doi, Genie) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Summons Returned Unexecuted #13 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by Forthwith.OTHER: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of S/C Returned Executed as to U.S.A. The filer is to refile and enter the correct event. (lc) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Summons Returned Unexecuted #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of S/C Returned Executed as to USA. Incorrect event created incorrect or misinformation. Pdf document are proofs of service of process on federal defendants. The cited event prompts filer to select required information..all missing on docket entry. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 13 (STRICKEN PER 1/27/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 15). Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by plaintiff Yongin Jo. as to All Defendants. (Doi, Genie) Modified on 1/27/2022 (lc). |
| Filing 12 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (lc) |
| Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (lc) |
| Filing 10 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (lc) |
| Filing 9 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant United States Department of Homeland Security. (lc) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #6 filed by plaintiff Yongin Jo. (Doi, Genie) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet and Notice of Interested Parties were incorrectly filed as attachments. Please utilize CM/ECF resources such as the search tool to locate the appropriate events for filing. No further action is required unless directed by the Court. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (jtil) |
Filing 5
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Yongin JO. (Doi, Genie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32564950 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Yongin JO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney Genie Doi added to party Yongin JO(pty:pla))(Doi, Genie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
