Marisol Perez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Marisol Perez |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Does 1-25, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv00077 |
| January 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Dismissing Entire Action Without Prejudice)(Kading, Theresa) |
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/3/2022. Scheduling Conference set for 3/17/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #3 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 served on January 6, 2022. (Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 1/5/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT H TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Does 1-25, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Marisol Perez. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/9/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.S NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1332, 1441 AND 1446 (DIVERSITY) filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 3 Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., identifying 1. Marisol Perez (Plaintiff); 2. Wells Fargo & Company, parent corporation of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; and 3. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Defendant). (Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Kading, Theresa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV29307 Receipt No: ACACDC-32571185 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attorney Theresa A Kading added to party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Kading, Theresa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
