Snap Inc. v. Drew Hirshfeld et al
| Snap Inc. |
| DREW HIRSHFELD, in his capacity as Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office,, THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,, Drew Hirshfeld and The United States Patent and Trademark Office |
| 2:2022cv00085 |
| January 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Snap Inc., re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #13 served on 1/11/22. (Bernstein, David) |
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Snap Inc., upon U.S. Attorney General Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged and name illegible). Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged, but not signed). Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged and name illegible). Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Bernstein, David) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Snap Inc., upon U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged and name illegible). Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged, but not signed). Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged and name illegible). Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Bernstein, David) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Snap Inc., upon Defendant The United States Patent and Trademark Office served on 1/14/2022, answer due 3/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged and name illegible). Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged, but not signed). Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged and name illegible). Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Bernstein, David) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Snap Inc., upon Defendant Drew Hirshfeld served on 1/14/2022, answer due 3/15/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to "Officer Doe" (Receipt signed and illegible). Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged, but not signed). Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Officer Doe (Receipt Acknowledged, but not signed). Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Bernstein, David) |
Filing 13
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 12 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant The United States Patent and Trademark Office. (car) |
| Filing 11 CORRECTED 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Drew Hirshfeld. (car) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: The Summons #9 was erroneously issued as a 21 DAY summons. A corrected 60 DAY summons will be issued. Docket item 9 should be disregarded. (car) |
| Filing 9 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 1/7/2022, SEE ITEM 10] 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Drew Hirshfeld. (car) Modified on 1/7/2022 (car). |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Snap Inc.. (Bernstein, David) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Snap Inc.. (Bernstein, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Snap Inc., identifying None. (Bernstein, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Snap Inc.. (Bernstein, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32573144 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Snap Inc.. (Attorney David Hal Bernstein added to party Snap Inc.(pty:pla))(Bernstein, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32573144 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Snap Inc.. (Attorney David Hal Bernstein added to party Snap Inc.(pty:pla))(Bernstein, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
