Christopher White v. Los Angeles County et al
| Christopher White |
| Los Angeles County, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Deputy Robert Watts, Deputy Kristian Kozelchick, Hildi Slattery and Does 1-7 |
| 2:2022cv00109 |
| January 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero, For the reasons stated below, the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. As discussed in Section V of this Order infra, Plaintiff must file a response to this Order, electing to proceed with one of three options, no later than April 4, 2022. re Complaint - (Referred), #1 (Attachments: #1 Attach 1 of 2, #2 Attach 2 of 2) (es)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: Granting #3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (es)
|
|
Filing 6
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Plaintiff is advised that the Court presently is screening the Complaint in this action, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Until the Complaint has been screened and the Court has ordered that service of process may occur, Plaintiff may not proceed with service of process upon Defendant(s). Should the Court determine that the Complaint may be served upon any or all Defendant(s), the Court will issue a separate order regarding service of process. [See document for further details.] (Attachments: #1 Attachment.CV-11) (es)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby GRANTED. Granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (es)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh)
|
|
Filing 3
REQUEST for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Christopher White. (lh)
|
|
Filing 2
REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Christopher White. (lh)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed against Defendants County of Los Angeles, Does, Kristian Kozelchick, Los Angeles County, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Hildi Slattery, Robert Watts Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Filed by Plaintiff Christopher White. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request) (lh)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
