Bryan Williams v. Happy Preschool Land, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Bryan Williams
Defendant: Happy Preschool Land, Inc., Armen Kuchakchyan and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv00129
Filed: January 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Margo A Rocconi
Referring Judge: Mark C Scarsi
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2022 Filing 15 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: In accordance with the Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically Filed Documents (ECF No. #14 , regarding Proof of Service (ECF No. #12 ), filed on January 21, 2022. It is hereby ordered the document is stricken as a corrected proof of service was filed on January 21, 2022 (ECF No. #13 . OFFICIAL case number is to read as: 2:22-cv-00129-MCS-MAR. Any future document that is filed with the wrong case number or judge's initials may result in the document being stricken. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smo)
January 24, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. These are not USDC Central District Case number or Judges as: '22CV15 GPC JLB Other error(s) with document(s): Correct case number is to read as: 2:22-cv-00129-MCS-MARx. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
January 21, 2022 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Happy Preschool Land, Inc. served on 1/19/2022, answer due 2/9/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Happy Preschool Land, Inc., by Armen Kuchakhchyan in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross)
January 21, 2022 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, upon Defendant Armen Kuchakchyan served on 1/19/2022, answer due 2/9/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Armen Kuchakhchyan in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross)
January 7, 2022 Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order re Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
January 7, 2022 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Happy Preschool Land, Inc., Armen Kuchakchyan. (lh)
January 7, 2022 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
January 7, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
January 7, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (lh)
January 6, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross)
January 6, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams, (Cornell, Ross)
January 6, 2022 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Cornell, Ross)
January 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32581747 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Bryan Williams. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Bryan Williams(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryan Williams v. Happy Preschool Land, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan Williams
Represented By: Ross Cornell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Happy Preschool Land, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Armen Kuchakchyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?