Clairece R. Andrus v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Clairece R Andrus |
| City of Los Angeles, LAPD Officer Ruiz, LAPD Officer Kim, LAPD Officer Carbonell, County of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive |
| 2:2022cv00144 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/15/2022. (tj)
|
| Filing 24 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Geoffrey R Plowden counsel for Defendants Carbonell, City of Los Angeles, Kim, Ruiz. Adding Surekha A. Shepherd as counsel of record for City of Los Angeles, LAPD Ofcrs Ruiz, Kim and Carbonell for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants City of Los Angeles, LAPD Officers Ruiz, Kim and Carbonell. (Plowden, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Carbonell, City of Los Angeles, Kim, Ruiz, (Plowden, Geoffrey) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Carbonell, City of Los Angeles, Kim, Ruiz.(Attorney Geoffrey R Plowden added to party Carbonell(pty:dft), Attorney Geoffrey R Plowden added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Geoffrey R Plowden added to party Kim(pty:dft), Attorney Geoffrey R Plowden added to party Ruiz(pty:dft))(Plowden, Geoffrey) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (DKT. #20 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. The deadline for Defendants City of Los Angeles, Officer Ruiz, Officer Kim, and Officer Carbonell to respond to the initial complaint is continued to 3/2/2022. (jp)
|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Cory M Brente added to party City of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Brente, Cory) |
|
Filing 19
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO OFFICER KIM by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than 2/22/2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to LAPD Officer Kim. (See attached Civil Minutes for further specifics). (jp)
|
| Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to County of Los Angeles answer now due 3/14/2022, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Attorney Paniz Hayati Rezvan added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Hayati Rezvan, Paniz) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) #13 , #14 , #15 , #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: (1) Incorrect statute prompt of FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) selected...service was NOT made on the Clerks Office of USDC. (2) The documents are ACCEPTED as filed. Counsel shall take notice of the CM/ECF procedures. Any future document will be stricken for failure to follow the procedures. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Clairece R Andrus, upon Defendant Ruiz served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Toni Dipaolo, harbor Subpoena Control in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Lorant, Etan) Modified on 1/28/2022 (jp). |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Clairece R Andrus, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles served on 1/26/2022, answer due 2/16/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Valdivia, Deputy Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Lorant, Etan). Modified on 1/28/2022 (jp). . |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Clairece R Andrus, upon Defendant Kim served on 1/21/2022, answer due 2/11/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Subpoena Control Officer Euyoque No. 30821 in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Lorant, Etan). Modified on 1/28/2022 (jp). |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Clairece R Andrus, upon Defendant City of Los Angeles served on 1/21/2022, answer due 2/11/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Valdivia, Deputy Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Lorant, Etan). Modified on 1/28/2022 (jp). |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Clairece R Andrus, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 1/21/2022, answer due 2/11/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jimmy Prieto, Deputy Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (Lorant, Etan) Modified on 1/28/2022 (jp). |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant County of Los Angeles. (et) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Carbonell, City of Los Angeles, Kim, Ruiz. (et) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (et) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Clairece R Andrus. (Lorant, Etan) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney for Plaintiff Clairece R Andrus, (Lorant, Etan) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request #2 filed by Attorney for Plaintiff Clairece R Andrus. (Lorant, Etan) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Attorney for Plaintiff Clairece R Andrus. (Lorant, Etan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32585221 - Fee: $402, filed by Attorney for Plaintiff Clairece R Andrus. (Attorney Etan Z Lorant added to party Clairece R Andrus(pty:bkmov))(Lorant, Etan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
