Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited v. Claudia Eve Kleefeld
Plaintiff: Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited
Defendant: Claudia Eve Kleefeld
Case Number: 2:2022cv00169
Filed: January 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2022 Filing 13 Defendant's WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited. upon Claudia Eve Kleefeld waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/2/2022, answer due 4/4/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Dawn B. Everly Person Authorized to Accept. (Booth, Hillary)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
January 10, 2022 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #5 as to Defendant Claudia Eve Kleefeld. (lh)
January 10, 2022 Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
January 10, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
January 10, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh)
January 7, 2022 Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #5 filed by Plaintiff Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited. (Booth, Hillary)
January 7, 2022 Filing 6 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited. as to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #5 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit B to Complaint)(Booth, Hillary)
January 7, 2022 Filing 5 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 01/07/2022, receipt number BCACDC-32589392), filed by Plaintiff Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited.(Booth, Hillary)
January 7, 2022 Filing 4 DISCLOSURE Statement filed by Plaintiff Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited (Booth, Hillary)
January 7, 2022 Filing 3 **DUPLICATE** CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited. (Booth, Hillary) Modified on 1/10/2022 (lh).
January 7, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited, identifying Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Ltd.. (Attorney Hillary Arrow Booth added to party Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited(pty:pla))(Booth, Hillary)
January 7, 2022 Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited. (Booth, Hillary)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited v. Claudia Eve Kleefeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cadogan Tate Los Angeles Limited
Represented By: Hillary Arrow Booth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Claudia Eve Kleefeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?