Daedalus Blue LLC v. DJI Technology, Inc. et al
| Daedalus Blue LLC |
| DJI Technology, Inc., DJI Research LLC, iFlight Technology Company Limited and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2022cv00265 |
| January 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| George H Wu |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT #23 by Judge George H. Wu: Having considered the Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC, and defendants DJI Technology, Inc., DJI Research LLC, and iFlight Technology Company Ltd., and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that: The deadline for DJI Technology and DJI Research to answer Daedalus Blues Complaint shall be extended up to and include May 18, 2022, coincident with the deadline for iFlight Technology's answer to the Complaint. (bm)
|
| Filing 23 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to May 18, 2022 filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 22 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. upon iFlight Technology Company Limited waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/17/2022, answer due 5/18/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Shawn S. Chang. (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC, upon Defendant DJI Technology, Inc. served on 2/10/2022, answer due 3/3/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Noel Mayorga - Inventory control specialist in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC, upon Defendant DJI Research LLC served on 2/9/2022, answer due 3/2/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Yin Cheung - IP Counsel in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. Related Case(s): 6:20-cv-00073-ADA (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Charles E. Cantine counsel for Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. Adding Charles E. Cantine as counsel of record for Daedalus Blue LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Cantine, Charles) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #13 Non-Resident Attorney Joseph Diamante APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC, designating Ryan E. Hatch as local counsel. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #12 Non-Resident Attorney Charles E Cantine APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC, designating Ryan E Hatch as local counsel. (bm)
|
|
Filing 15
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu: 1. You are instructed to read and to follow (unless otherwise superseded herein) the Central District of California Local Rules (henceforth "Local Rules") 16-1 through 16-15 regarding pre-trial requirements. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Percy Anderson. Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:22-cv-00265-GW-RAOx. (aco)
|
| Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Joseph Diamante to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32636549) filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Charles E. Cantine to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32636490) filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Joseph Diamante. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Charles E Cantine. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants DJI Research LLC, DJI Technology, Inc., iFlight Technology Company Limited. (car) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC, identifying DJI Technology, Inc., DJI Research LLC,and iFlight Technology Company Ltd.. (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Daedalus Blue LLC. (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Hatch, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32613863 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Daedalus Blue LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E) (Attorney Ryan E. Hatch added to party Daedalus Blue LLC(pty:pla))(Hatch, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
