Superama Corporation, Inc. v. Tokyo Broadcasting System, Inc. et al
| Superama Corporation, Inc. |
| Tokyo Broadcasting System, Inc. and Does 1-100, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv00299 |
| January 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Steve Kim |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-03059-MWF (JCx). Case transferred from Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:22-cv-00299-MWF (JCx). Signed by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (et)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-3059-MWF-JC (Stevens, Rory) |
| Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc.. upon Tokyo Broadcasting System, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/18/2022, answer due 5/19/2022. Waiver of Service signed by Wilmore F. Holbrow III. (Stevens, Rory) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Rory Lawrence Stevens counsel for Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc.. Adding Rory L. Stevens as counsel of record for Superama Corporation, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc.. (Attorney Rory Lawrence Stevens added to party Superama Corporation, Inc.(pty:pla))(Stevens, Rory) |
| Filing 17 CORRECTED AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Amended Complaint/Petition, #14 , filed by Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc.(Hamilton, Ryan) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: "Corrected" Complaint #14 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by Forthwith. OTHER: The case number is incorrect or missing. (lc) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Corrected Complaint #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Other error(s) with document(s): Case number area left Blank. All filings are to reflect case number and assigned Judge and Magistrate's initials to read as: 2:22cv00299 FLA (SKx). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 14 (STRICKEN PER 2/4/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 16).Corrected AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc.(Hamilton, Ryan) Modified on 2/4/2022 (lc). |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Notice (Other) #11 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document Forthwith. (lc) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: SEE BELOW UNDER OTHER. THE PDF document attached to Notice (Other) is a Complaint..texted as Corrected Complaint in that the original complaint pdf attached was incorrect and was filed per Errata docket no. 10 which contains previously filed document with their prior electronic headers still active, thus making current electronic headers in docket no. 10 Illegible. Clerk unable to determine the propriety of filing a "Corrected" complaint under event Notice (Other) in that no defendant would be able to "answer" a " Notice (Other), instead of a possible "Amended Complaint" filed under its proper event. Other error(s) with document(s): THE PDF document attached to Notice (Other) is a Complaint..texted as Corrected Complaint in that the original complaint pdf attached was incorrect and was filed per Errata docket no. 10 which contains previously filed document with their prior electronic headers still active, thus making current electronic headers in docket no. 10 Illegible. Clerk unable to determine the propriety of filing a "Corrected" complaint under event Notice (Other) in that no defendant would be able to "answer" a " Notice (Other), instead of a possible "Amended Complaint" filed under its proper event.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 11 (STRICKEN PER 2/1/2022 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 13).NOTICE filed by Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc.. Corrected Complaint (Hamilton, Ryan) Modified on 2/1/2022 (lc). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc.. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Hamilton Declaration regarding Notice of Errata for Submission of Incorrect Document as Original Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A_ Correct Original Complaint as Received in the Inbox of Ryan Hamilton at 11:40 p.m. Pacific on January 13, 2022)(Hamilton, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Superama Corporation, Inc.. (Hamilton, Ryan) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (tf)
|
| Filing 7 Notice and CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Counsel for Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc., identifying N/A. (Hamilton, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32623449 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Superama Corporation, Inc., d/b/a USA Sumo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Ryan A Hamilton added to party Superama Corporation, Inc., d/b/a USA Sumo(pty:bkmov))(Hamilton, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
