Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc. v. Hernan Lopez et al
Plaintiff: Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc.
Defendant: Hernan Lopez, Roberto Alfredo Lopez Bustillo and DOES 1-25, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2022cv00331
Filed: January 14, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Pursuant to Plaintiffs Notice of Dismissal #13 , and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(i), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The entire action and all claims asserted therein are hereby DISMISSED; and 2. All dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case.(Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
March 17, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc.. Dismissal is Without prejudice. (Fischer, Michael)
March 9, 2022 Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court received and reviewed Defendant Hernan Lopez's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiff's Complaint #11 . For good cause shown, the extension is GRANTED. Lopez's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby CONTINUED to April 7, 2022. To be clear, to the extent Lopez's Motion seeks an order quashing service or dismissing the Complaint, or any other relief other than a continuance of Lopez's response deadline, the Motion is denied.Moreover, this Order continues the response deadline for Defendant Lopez only. Lopez is not an attorney, and he is therefore not permitted to represent the other defendant, Roberto Alfredo Lopez Bustillo, in filings and appearances before this Court. (lc) Modified on 3/9/2022 (lc).
March 8, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE/ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by defendant Hernan Lopez. (lc)
January 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc) Modified on 1/19/2022 (lc).
January 19, 2022 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Roberto Alfredo Lopez Bustillo and Hernan Lopez. (Attachments: #1 ABustillo) (jtil)
January 18, 2022 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
January 18, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
January 18, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil)
January 14, 2022 Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc.. (Fischer, Michael)
January 14, 2022 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc., (Attorney Michael Robert Fischer added to party Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc.(pty:pla))(Fischer, Michael)
January 14, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc.. (Fischer, Michael)
January 14, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc.. (Fischer, Michael)
January 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-32630894 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc..(Fischer, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc. v. Hernan Lopez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Skybus Jet Cargo, Inc.
Represented By: Michael Robert Fischer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hernan Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roberto Alfredo Lopez Bustillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?