Esmeralda Ramirez et al v. FCA US LLC et al
| Esmeralda Ramirez, Gustavo Ortiz Hernandez and Gustavo Ortiz |
| FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2022cv00419 |
| January 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Otis D Wright |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 REPLY filed by Plaintiffs Gustavo Ortiz Hernandez, Esmeralda Ramirez to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,,, Terminate Hearings,,,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,,,,, #11 , Response #12 Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant's Memorandum in Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause Regarding Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Daniel Kalinowski, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G)(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel Max Kalinowski counsel for Plaintiffs Gustavo Ortiz Hernandez, Esmeralda Ramirez. Adding Daniel Kalinowski as counsel of record for Esmeralda Ramirez and Gustavo Ortiz Hernandez AKA Gustavo Ortiz for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Esmeralda Ramirez and Gustavo Ortiz Hernandez AKA Gustavo Ortiz. (Attorney Daniel Max Kalinowski added to party Gustavo Ortiz Hernandez(pty:pla), Attorney Daniel Max Kalinowski added to party Esmeralda Ramirez(pty:pla))(Kalinowski, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Defendant FCA US LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,,, Terminate Hearings,,,,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,,,,, #11 (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Amount in Controversy); Order CONTINUING Scheduling Conference to April 11, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. Defendant removed this case and therefore bears the burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant is therefore ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, to be received by the Court no later than March 8, 2022, why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction due to an insufficient amount in controversy. Failure to timely respond to this Order shall result in a remand without further warning. Plaintiffs may, but are not required to, file a written Reply to Defendant's Response, to be received by the Court no later than March 15, 2022. The parties should understand this Order to be a dual-pronged inquiry into both the facial sufficiency of Defendant's jurisdictional allegations as well as the factual sufficiency of Defendant's demonstration of the amount in controversy, which the Court now calls on Defendant to make. The parties are accordingly encouraged to submit declarations or other evidence in support of their jurisdictional contentions. Finally, to provide time to first address these jurisdictional questions, the Court CONTINUES the Scheduling Conference to April 11, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. (lc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for March 28, 2022 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 1/13/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, FCA US LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Esmeralda Ramirez, Gustavo Ortiz Hernandez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/16/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant FCA US LLC (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV45978 Receipt No: ACACDC-32653175 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party FCA US LLC(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
