Teresa Fuentes et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Teresa Fuentes and Ansony Hernandez |
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2022cv00430 |
January 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
John F Walter |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER #21 by Judge John F. Walter. The entire action, including all claims stated herein against all parties, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (iv) |
Filing 21 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to case settled filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 20 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. As a result of the parties' violation of the Courts Order, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv) |
Filing 19 STATUS REPORT re Settlement filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 18 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 10/14/2022 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 10/21/2022 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 11/1/2022 at 8:30 AM. (iv) |
Filing 17 ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on February 28, 2022 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby:ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation).The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: May 16, 2022. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: May 20, 2022. (iv) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company re Order to Show Cause Re Standing Order (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 15 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 14 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot of Lead Counsel filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 13 DECLARATION of Kevin Jacobson re Order to Show Cause, #11 RE: IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS FOR VIOLATING THE COURTS STANDING ORDER BY FAILING TO FILE A DECLARATION OF LEAD COUNSEL filed by Plaintiffs Teresa Fuentes, Ansony Hernandez. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Kevin Jacobson of Lead Counsel filed by Plaintiffs Teresa Fuentes, Ansony Hernandez. (Jacobson, Kevin) |
Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are ordered to show cause in writing by February 15, 2022 why the Court should not impose sanctions in the amount of $750.00 for violating the Court's Standing Order. (iv) |
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for February 28, 2022 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before February 14, 2022. (iv) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (lh) |
NON-CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Teresa Fuentes, Ansony Hernandez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/20/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV46404 Receipt No: ACACDC-32655661 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.