Kenneth Urquidi et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
| Kenneth Urquidi, Sr, Iris Urquidi, Kaydee Urquidi, Kenneth Urquidi, Jr, Kenberly Garcia and X. G. |
| Union Pacific Railroad Company and Does 1 through 25, inclusive |
| Gary Stern |
| 2:2022cv00464 |
| January 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Gary Stern has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that GARY N. STERN may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. All parties and the Panel Mediator have agreed that the mediation will be held on 8/24/2022 and counsel will submit mediation statements seven (7) calendar days before the session. Filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Urquidi, Sr(Fredgant, Perry) |
Filing 16
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 10/14/22. Status Conference set for 10/18/2022. (es)
|
|
Filing 15
(1) SCHEDULING ORDER (2) VACATING THE MARCH 15, 2022 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. See document for details. (es)
|
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7-8 days, filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Urquidi, Sr.. (Fredgant, Perry) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 2 filed. Parties request to appear before a neutral selected from the court's Mediation Panel for mediation. Filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Urquidi, Sr(Fredgant, Perry) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before United States Magistrate Judge by all parties pursuant to GO 18-11 is approved by Dale S. Fischer and Alexander F. MacKinnon. This case is hereby reassigned to Alexander F. MacKinnon for all further proceedings. Case number will now read 2:22-cv-00464-AFM. (aco) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. The matter is set for a scheduling conference on Tuesday, March 15, 2022, at 10 a.m. [See Order for details and deadlines.] (es)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 (Attachments: #1 Statement of Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate)(Fredgant, Perry) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 3/14/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 3 Civil Cover Sheet, 4 Certificate of Service are attached to the Notice of Removal. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 25, inlcusive, Union Pacific Railroad Company. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs X. G., Kenneth Urquidi, Jr, Kenneth Urquidi, Sr, Kaydee Urquidi, Iris Urquidi, Kenberly Garcia. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/22/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company identifying Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Corporation, Southern Pacific Rail Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Flesher, Jacob) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company.(Flesher, Jacob) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV39150 Receipt No: ACACDC-32660985 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Jacob D Flesher added to party Union Pacific Railroad Company(pty:dft))(Flesher, Jacob) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
